philosophersbeard.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the philosophersbeard.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host philosophersbeard.org. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Google Inc. .

the related websites

healingmeditations.co.uk ilovephilosophy.com web-dir.co.uk beardsmen.co.uk assets.cambridge.org the-tls.co.uk newn.cam.ac.uk flightglobal.com mamma-mia.com global-strategy.net dayagainsthomophobia.org gsk.com novonordisk.com aberdeen-asset.com wmo.int eduroam.org nortonrosefulbright.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called GSE containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

essays in philosophy, politics and economics by thomas r. wells monday, 8 october 2018 no one actually believes fake news. so what's the problem? the statistics are shocking. a russian troll farm created false anti-clinton stories and distributed them on platforms like facebook and twitter. as many as 126 million facebook users may have encountered at least one piece of russian propaganda; russian tweets received as many as 288 million views. the russians, just like trump's campaign itself, leveraged the adtech infrastructure developed by social media companies like facebook, google, and twitter to identify and target those most receptive to their lies and provocations. what is going on? is this something new? does it matter? read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post sunday, 16 september 2018 invisible hand ethics "[b]y directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention….by pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. i have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good. " (adam smith, the wealth of nations, iv.2.9) doing right by others is difficult and time-consuming. hence the attraction of what i call ‘invisible hand ethics', in which we mind our own business and the ethics takes care of itself. this is modelled on adam smith's famous account of how the overall outcome of lots of self-interested actions in the economic sphere can be good for society as a whole. bakers just want to make a buck, but their self-interest produces the bread that feeds the people. their competition for sales keeps prices down. the customers in turn just want the cheapest best bread, but wind up helping the best bakers make a good living. you get the idea. smith argued that in the economic domain this could be a far more reliable mechanism for achieving good outcomes than good intentions. read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post friday, 27 july 2018 tyrants aren’t smarter than democrats. just more evil tyrants like vladamir putin and kim jong un seem to win a lot of their geopolitical contests against democratic governments. how do they do it? a common explanation is that these tyrants are better at playing the game. they are strategic geniuses leading governments with decades of experience in foreign affairs and characterised by single-mindedness and a long-term horizon. of course they are going to make better geopolitical moves than democratic governments riven by political factionalism and only able to think as far ahead as the next election. this explanation is wrong. tyrants don’t succeed because they are especially skilled at the game of geopolitics, but because they are baddies. tyrants make bold moves because they are willing to subject their country (and the whole world) to more risk. they can do that because they care less than democrats, and hence worry less, about bringing harms to their people. like a hedge fund manager, they can afford to take big risks because they are not playing with their own money. when tyrants win it is because of luck, not brilliance. this is easier to see when tyrants lose – as they nearly all do in the end, when their luck runs out. read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post saturday, 5 may 2018 the robots are coming for our jobs. what will the workplace of tomorrow look like? machines powered by self-learning algorithms and internet connections are displacing humans from all kinds of jobs, from driving to legal discovery to acting in movies. will there be any work left for us to do? economics says yes. will it be awful or will it be nice? that is up to us. new essay just published for the institute of arts and ideas series: philosophy for our times. email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post thursday, 15 february 2018 can free speech survive the internet? the internet has made it easier than ever to speak to others. it has empowered individuals to publish our opinions without first convincing a media company of their commercial value; to find and share others' views without the fuss of photocopying and mailing newspaper clippings; and to respond to those views without the limitations of a newspaper letter page. in this sense the internet has been a great boon to the freedom of speech. yet that very ease of communication creates new limits to the freedom part of free speech: the ability to speak our mind to those we wish without fear of reprisal. read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post monday, 22 january 2018 productivity is the wrong argument for diversity if you look around your workplace and everyone, or least all the managers, look the same - same sex, skin colour, social class, age - then your company has a diversity problem. but why is it a problem? because the most obvious explanation is a failure of meritocracy. such features as the colour of one's skin or sex are arbitrary and irrelevant to people's ability to do a job. therefore the fact that people of certain skin colours or sex are missing from your workplace relative to the wider society presents a prima facie challenge to the fairness of your company's criteria for employment and promotion. to assume otherwise - for example that people of certain colours, sex, class, age, happen to have different (inferior) career preferences or different (inferior) talents has no credibility. it is to assume the exact set of facts most convenient to make a problem someone else's, rather than to take responsibility for investigating and fixing it. call this the negative argument for diversity: if you don't have internal diversity in line with the wider society then you are probably treating people unfairly and you need to investigate and try to fix it. for example by identifying and mitigating biases in how job applicants are evaluated and structural impediments to their career progress. it leaves a lot of details still to be argued out, but i think it is the right way to go. but there is another kind of argument that is now much more common, the positive argument that organisations should promote diversity because it pays off . this is the argument i want to criticise, on the grounds that it jeopardises the negative argument from fairness; reduces individuals to stereotypes about groups; and perpetuates unjust stereotypes and social relations. read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post thursday, 18 january 2018 crime hurts. justice should heal judicial punishment is the curious idea that individuals deserve to be punished by the state for breaking its laws. intellectually this is rather counter-intuitive. if crime is so bad because of the social trauma it causes then setting out to hurt more people would seems a strange way to make things better. there are intellectual arguments for retributive punishment of course, many of them rather ingenious. but they have the look of post hoc rationalisations for a brute social fact: it just so happens that we like making wrongdoers suffer. the modern criminal justice system – bloated and terroristic – is the product of government expansionism combined with this societal vindictiveness. read more » email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest links to this post wednesday, 29 november 2017 the revolt against liberalism: diagnosing and defeating populism experience suggests that if men cannot struggle on behalf of a just cause because that just cause was

URL analysis for philosophersbeard.org

http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2016/10/a-team-approach-to-intergenerational.html#more
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/search/label/feminism
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/search/label/education
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2011/04/
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2010/02/
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2017/03/the-case-for-subsidising-art-and-taxing.html#more
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2016/08/too-much-competition-is-ruining-sport.html
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/search/label/keynes
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2010/10/morality-vs-ethics.html
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2015/02/
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/search/label/heterodox%20economics
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2015/03/
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2017/10/
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2018/01/why-we-should-reject-productivity.html#links
http://www.philosophersbeard.org/search/label/progressivism
blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: PHILOSOPHERSBEARD.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D163106061-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com
Registrar URL: http://www.publicdomainregistry.com
Updated Date: 2017-07-12T03:38:08Z
Creation Date: 2011-08-22T01:34:39Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-08-22T01:34:39Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Registrar IANA ID: 303
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2013775952
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registry Registrant ID: C23711765-LROR
Registrant Name: Domain Admin
Registrant Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Registrant Street: 10 Corporate Drive
Registrant City: Burlington
Registrant State/Province: MA
Registrant Postal Code: 01803
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.8022274003
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: C23711765-LROR
Admin Name: Domain Admin
Admin Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Admin Street: 10 Corporate Drive
Admin City: Burlington
Admin State/Province: MA
Admin Postal Code: 01803
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.8022274003
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: C23711765-LROR
Tech Name: Domain Admin
Tech Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Tech Street: 10 Corporate Drive
Tech City: Burlington
Tech State/Province: MA
Tech Postal Code: 01803
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.8022274003
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: NS3.ACTIVE-DNS.COM
Name Server: NS4.ACTIVE-DNS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-05-18T12:22:49Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS philosophersbeard.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME philosophersbeard.org

  HANDLE D163106061-LROR

  CREATED 2011-08-22

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

NSERVER

  NS3.ACTIVE-DNS.COM 162.251.82.246

  NS4.ACTIVE-DNS.COM 162.251.82.252

OWNER

  HANDLE C23711765-LROR

  NAME Domain Admin

  ORGANIZATION Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)

ADDRESS

STREET
10 Corporate Drive

  CITY Burlington

  STATE MA

  PCODE 01803

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.8022274003

  EMAIL [email protected]

ADMIN

  HANDLE C23711765-LROR

  NAME Domain Admin

  ORGANIZATION Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)

ADDRESS

STREET
10 Corporate Drive

  CITY Burlington

  STATE MA

  PCODE 01803

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.8022274003

  EMAIL [email protected]

TECH

  HANDLE C23711765-LROR

  NAME Domain Admin

  ORGANIZATION Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)

ADDRESS

STREET
10 Corporate Drive

  CITY Burlington

  STATE MA

  PCODE 01803

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.8022274003

  EMAIL [email protected]

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .